The Knicks and Celtics have clashed for decades, turning every game into a battle of wills. Think back to the 1970s when Boston’s grit met New York’s hustle in epic playoff wars. Today, in the 2024-2025 season, their rivalry stays fierce, with recent matchups packed full of player stats that tell a real story. You won’t just get win totals here—we’re breaking down individual impacts that decide these Knicks vs Boston Celtics games.
Core Offensive Production: Scoring and Efficiency Leaders
Offense wins fans, but in Knicks vs Celtics matchups, it’s the smart scoring that shifts momentum. Players from both sides push hard to outscore each other, often in tight games that come down to the wire. Let’s look at how key guys stack up in the last five games this season.
Points Per Game (PPG) Comparison: Guards vs. Wings
Jalen Brunson leads the Knicks with 28.4 points per game against Boston, mixing drives to the basket with pull-up jumpers. Jayson Tatum counters for the Celtics at 30.2 PPG, leaning on threes from deep—about 40% of his points come from beyond the arc. Julius Randle adds 22.6 for New York, mostly inside the paint, while Jaylen Brown scores 25.8 for Boston with a blend of mid-range shots.
- Brunson’s scoring: High from drives (12.3 points) and threes (6.1 points).
- Tatum’s edge: More three-point attempts (8.4 per game) than Randle’s inside focus (14.2 paint points).
- Brown’s volume: 18.5 from wings, showing Boston’s spread-out attack.
These numbers show guards like Brunson control pace, but wings like Tatum exploit space. In their November 2024 clash, Tatum’s 32 points sealed a Celtics win.
True Shooting Percentage (TS%) and Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%)
Efficiency matters when defenses tighten up. The Knicks’ top scorers hit a TS% of 58.2 against Boston, boosted by Brunson’s 62% on drives. Celtics players edge out at 59.8 TS%, thanks to Tatum’s eFG% of 54.1 on high-volume shots.
Randle stands out with a 61.3 TS% in post-ups, beating Brown’s 57.2. But Boston’s scheme forces Knicks into tougher shots—New York’s eFG% drops to 51% in the fourth quarter. One outlier: OG Anunoby’s 65% TS% on limited attempts, turning spot-up threes into easy buckets.
This gap highlights Boston’s defense making Knicks work harder for points. You see it in games where efficiency dips below 55%, often leading to losses.
Assist-to-Turnover Ratios: Playmaking Control
Point guards shine or sink based on ball control. Brunson posts a 3.2 assist-to-turnover ratio in these games, feeding Randle for easy looks. Jrue Holiday matches that for Boston at 3.1, keeping turnovers low at 1.8 per game.
Holiday’s vision creates 7.4 assists, mostly to wings cutting baseline. Brunson edges in pressure spots, with zero turnovers in the last game’s clutch moments. A high ratio like this keeps offenses flowing—low turnovers mean fewer fast-break chances for the other side.
In rivalry heat, these ratios decide who controls the tempo. Boston’s edge comes from Holiday’s calm handling against Knicks’ traps.
Defensive Dominance: Rebounding and Disruption Metrics
Defense turns good teams into great ones, especially in Knicks vs Celtics battles. Both squads crash boards and swipe balls to stop runs. Recent stats reveal who owns the glass and paint.
Rebounding Margins: Offensive vs. Defensive Boards
The Celtics grab a slight rebounding edge, out-rebounding Knicks by 4.2 per game in the last five. Boston’s ORB% sits at 28.1, leading to 14 second-chance points. New York’s defensive boards hold strong at 72%, but they leak 12 offensive rebounds to Boston.
- Key for Knicks: Randle pulls 10.4 rebounds, focusing on defensive ends to limit Tatum.
- Celtics strength: Al Horford’s 8.2, including 3.1 offensive, sparks comebacks.
- Impact: Games with over 15 second-chance points for one team end in wins 80% of the time.
This battle for boards often flips scores. In October’s opener, Boston’s extra rebounds fueled a 112-109 victory.
Blocks and Steals: Defensive Playmaking Impact
Blocks and steals create chaos. Mitchell Robinson swats 2.4 shots per game for Knicks, protecting the rim from Tatum’s drives. Derrick White leads Boston with 1.8 blocks and 1.6 steals, disrupting Brunson’s pick-and-rolls.
Holiday adds 2.1 steals, forcing 15 turnovers in one matchup. These plays lead to 18 transition points for Celtics. Robinson’s paint presence holds opponents to 48% shooting inside.
Defensive anchors like these shut down sets—think White’s steal stripping Randle mid-drive. They turn defense into offense fast.
Opponent Field Goal Percentage (Opp FG%) When Guarded by Key Defenders
Tracking data shows defensive matchups matter. When guarded by Anunoby, Tatum shoots 42% from the field, down from his season average. Brown faces OG’s length, hitting just 39% on threes.
On the flip, White contests Brunson to a 44% FG%, forcing tough fades. Randle drops to 46% against Horford’s positioning. These lowers prove elite defenders alter shots.
In close games, holding stars under 45% often wins it. Knicks’ perimeter D shines here, but Boston’s paint work holds firm.
Intangibles and Advanced Metrics: Measuring True Impact
Box scores miss the full picture—advanced stats capture hidden value in Knicks vs Boston Celtics match player stats. These numbers reveal who truly sways games.
Plus/Minus Differential in Key Moments (4th Quarter/Overtime)
Clutch time separates contenders. Brunson boasts a +12 plus/minus in the last five minutes of close games, scoring key buckets. Tatum tops at +15, with his threes swinging momentum.
Randle’s +8 comes from rebounding in OT. Holiday’s defense nets +10 for Boston. In November’s thriller, Tatum’s +18 sealed the deal.
These diffs show stars step up when it counts. You feel the pressure, but they deliver.
Usage Rate vs. Efficiency Correlation
High-usage players carry loads. Tatum’s 32% usage yields 59% TS% against Knicks, maintaining flow. Brunson’s 29% usage hits 58%, but dips under pressure.
Randle’s 28% leads to contested shots, at 55% efficiency. Boston forces his usage up, dropping his output. Correlation here: High usage with steady efficiency wins games.
Knicks succeed when spreading usage—under 30% for stars keeps them sharp.
Free Throw Rate (FTR) and Fouls Drawn
Getting to the line breaks defenses. Celtics draw fouls at a 0.32 FTR, with Tatum at 0.38 from drives. Knicks match at 0.31, Randle leading with 8.2 attempts per game.
Boston converts 78% from the stripe, adding 20 points. In physical matchups, fouls drawn spike—14 for Celtics in one win. High FTR means penetrating attacks work.
This stat favors teams that attack the rim. Knicks need more trips to match Boston’s edge.
Player Spotlight: Defining Statistical Battles
Stars define rivalries. In Knicks vs Celtics match player stats, head-to-heads tell the tale. Let’s spotlight key fights.
Primary Matchup Analysis: Star Player A vs. Star Player B
Julius Randle vs. Jayson Tatum heats up every time. Randle averages 22.6 PPG and 9.8 rebounds when facing Tatum, shooting 48% FG. Tatum counters with 30.2 PPG, 8.4 assists, and 52% FG in the vicinity.
Randle grabs 4.2 offensive boards, but Tatum’s 2.1 steals disrupt him. Assists flow from Tatum’s playmaking—7.2 when guarding Randle. This duel often decides paint control.
Tatum holds a slight stats edge, but Randle’s physicality wears him down late.
Role Player X-Factor Statistics
Role players swing outcomes. OG Anunoby’s 42% three-point shooting on 5.3 attempts boosts Knicks’ spacing. For Celtics, Derrick White’s 1.8 steals and 38% from deep tilt games.
Anunoby’s defense limits Brown to 41% shooting. White’s +9 plus/minus in bench minutes adds spark. Their threes—Anunoby at 2.1 made, White at 2.4—open floors.
These guys provide the X-factor, turning good lineups great.
Historical Trend Correction: Are Recent Stats Reflecting Long-Term Trends?
Over five years, Tatum averaged 26 PPG vs. Knicks, now up to 30.2—escalating in this rivalry. Brunson’s 24 PPG career mark rose to 28.4 this season, showing growth.
Randle’s rebounds hold steady at 10, but efficiency climbed from 52% to 55%. Trends point up for both stars. Recent stats build on history, with Boston’s wings improving most.
This uptick means fiercer battles ahead.
Actionable Takeaways: How Statistical Anomalies Dictate Outcomes
Stats point to paths for wins. In Knicks vs Boston Celtics match player stats, anomalies like hot shooting change everything. Here’s what to watch.
Identifying the Statistical Trigger for a Knicks Victory
Knicks win when they outscore in threes—hitting 38% on 25 attempts. They need 12+ made threes to top Boston’s defense. Paint points under 40 for Celtics seals it.
Bench scoring over 35 helps too. In wins, Brunson’s assists hit 8+, feeding open looks.
Focus here to predict upsets.
The Celtics’ Statistical Path to Dominance
Boston dominates with defensive rebounds—holding Knicks under 10 offensive boards. Wing efficiency above 55% TS% from Tatum and Brown crushes New York.
Turnovers forced over 14 lead to easy buckets. They win 4 of 5 when these hit.
Master these for continued success.
Tip: Monitoring Lineup Efficiency Shifts
Track five-man units. Knicks’ Brunson-Randle-Anunoby lineup nets +8 rating vs. Boston. Celtics’ Tatum-Brown-Holiday-White-Horford posts +12.
Small-ball shifts drop ratings—watch for injuries. Best units generate 110+ points per 100 possessions.
Use this to spot game-changers.
Conclusion: Statistical Supremacy in the Modern Era
Recent Knicks vs Celtics match player stats show Boston’s edge in efficiency and rebounding, with Tatum’s scoring leading the charge. Knicks counter with Brunson’s control and defensive grit from Anunoby. Mastering these metrics reveals why games stay close—offense sparks, but defense decides.
The rivalry thrives on these numbers, painting a picture of balanced talent. As the season rolls on, watch how players adjust. Dive into more NBA stats on our site and gear up for the next clash—you won’t want to miss it.
Related Posts
